Question 1

What is happening in this passage about the tribe of Zebulun?

Accepted Answer

This passage tells how the tribe of Zebulun received its share of the promised land. The land was given by lot, and Zebulun’s lot came up third. The writer then traces the edges of Zebulun’s territory by naming towns, a river, and a valley that marked the borders. After the border line is described, the passage lists twelve cities with their villages that lay within this area. It finishes by saying that this was Zebulun’s inheritance, given to the families within the tribe.

Question 2

Why are so many border places for Zebulun named in such detail?

Accepted Answer

The detailed list of place names shows that Zebulun’s land was clearly marked and not vague. By naming starting points, turns, and end points, the text shows that their inheritance had real borders on the ground, shared with other tribes and regions. This helped prevent disputes and made it clear which towns and villages belonged to Zebulun. It also shows that God’s gift of the land was specific and ordered, down to exact locations and not just a general area.

Question 3

What does it mean that this was the inheritance of the children of Zebulun?

Accepted Answer

Calling this land “the inheritance of the children of Zebulun” means it was their God-given share of the promised land. It was not something they simply chose for themselves. It was given to them as part of the wider division among all the tribes. The word “inheritance” also points to the land being passed on within the tribe, from family to family. The passage highlights that this inheritance was arranged by families, so each clan in Zebulun had its place within the larger tribal territory.

Question 4

Why does the passage mention twelve cities with their villages for Zebulun?

Accepted Answer

The passage closes the border description by counting “twelve cities with their villages.” This shows that Zebulun’s inheritance was not just open land but included settled towns and the smaller villages around them. The number gives a sense of how the people lived within their territory, gathered into towns with surrounding communities. It also marks off this section of the land list, so readers know where Zebulun’s portion begins and ends, before the description moves on to the next tribe’s inheritance.

Question 5

Who are the ‘children of Zebulun’ mentioned in this passage?

Accepted Answer

The “children of Zebulun” are the descendants of Zebulun, one of the sons of Jacob. By the time of this passage, they have grown into a full tribe within Israel, made up of many families and clans. When the text says the lot came up for the children of Zebulun “according to their families,” it means the land they received was divided among these family groups inside the tribe. So the phrase points both to their shared ancestor and to the way the land was shared out among his descendants.

Question 6

What is the valley of Jiphthah-el mentioned as an outgoing of the border?

Accepted Answer

The valley of Jiphthah-el is named as the place where the northern border of Zebulun’s land ends. The border goes around to Hannathon and then its “outgoings” are in this valley. That means the border line runs down into or finishes in this valley area. The passage does not explain more about the valley itself, but by using it as a border point, it shows it was a known and important landmark that helped people at the time understand where Zebulun’s territory stopped.

Question 7

Is the Bethlehem named here the same as the Bethlehem where Jesus was born?

Accepted Answer

The Bethlehem in this passage is a town within the territory of Zebulun. It is not the same town as the Bethlehem later known as the birthplace of Jesus, which lay in the territory of Judah. This passage simply lists Bethlehem among the twelve cities that belonged to Zebulun along with their villages. The shared name can be confusing, but the text itself treats this Bethlehem as one of several towns in Zebulun’s northern inheritance, not the southern town connected with later events.

Question 8

Why does this passage focus on land division instead of giving moral lessons?

Accepted Answer

Here the main concern is to record how the land was actually divided among Israel’s tribes. The focus is on lots, borders, and named towns, not on direct commands or moral teaching. This kind of passage still matters because it shows that God’s promise of land to the people was carried out in detail, tribe by tribe. It also helps tie later stories and place names back to a clear setting. While the passage does not spell out lessons, it shows God ordering the life of his people in a concrete way.

Question 9

Why might this passage feel difficult or less interesting to modern readers?

Accepted Answer

For many readers today, a list of borders and town names can feel dry or hard to follow, especially when the places are not familiar. The wording can seem repetitive, and without a map it is easy to get lost in the details. Yet in its own time, this record would have mattered a lot because it told families where they lived and what God had given them. Seeing that can help us be patient with passages like this, even if they do not speak to us as quickly as other parts of Scripture.

Joshua 19:10

¶ And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families: and the border of their inheritance was unto Sarid:

Zebulun’s Inheritance

Cross References

Joshua 19:10

¶ And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families: and the border of their inheritance was unto Sarid:

Share Options

All Verses

Verse + Context

Current Verse

Zebulun’s Inheritance

Cross References