Question 1

Why was Simeon’s inheritance located inside Judah’s territory?

Accepted Answer

The passage itself gives a clear reason. It says that Simeon’s inheritance came out of the portion of Judah because the part of Judah was too much for them. In simple terms, Judah’s territory was more than they needed, and from that area, towns and villages were set apart for Simeon. So Simeon, being a smaller tribe, did not receive a separate block of land far away, but towns within Judah’s larger region in the south. This explains why Simeon’s land lies “within the inheritance of the children of Judah.”

Question 2

What does it mean that the second lot came out for Simeon?

Accepted Answer

The passage says the second lot came out for Simeon, meaning that when the remaining land was being divided, lots were cast to show which tribe would receive which area. For these tribes, this was the second lot in that section of the process, and it fell to the tribe of Simeon. This was done according to their families, so their share was not random or grabbed by force, but given in an ordered way, with God guiding the outcome through the lot. The result was their towns listed in the verses.

Question 3

Which cities and villages were given to the tribe of Simeon?

Accepted Answer

The passage lists Simeon’s towns in detail. They include Beer-sheba (also called Sheba), Moladah, Hazar-shual, Balah, Azem, Eltolad, Bethul, Hormah, Ziklag, Beth-marcaboth, Hazar-susah, Beth-lebaoth, and Sharuhen, which are said to be thirteen cities with their villages. Then it adds Ain, Remmon, Ether, and Ashan, four cities with their villages. It also mentions all the villages around these places up to Baalath-beer, called Ramath of the south. All of these together made up Simeon’s inheritance.

Question 4

What does the phrase “Judah’s part was too much for them” tell us?

Accepted Answer

The phrase explains why Simeon’s inheritance was taken from Judah’s land. Judah had a part that was more than enough for that tribe. The wording does not go into details about numbers or measurements, but it shows that Judah’s share was larger than what they needed. Because of that, Simeon, a smaller tribe, received its inheritance from within Judah’s area. This short line is the key reason the text gives for the arrangement of these two tribes’ territories in the south.

Question 5

How does this passage connect to Jacob’s words about Simeon being scattered?

Accepted Answer

Elsewhere in Scripture, Simeon is spoken of as being divided and scattered in Israel. In this passage, Simeon does not receive a separate, clearly bordered territory of its own. Instead, its cities lie within Judah’s inheritance. Faithful readers have seen this as fitting with earlier words that Simeon would be divided among the other tribes. They are not far away, but they live in towns surrounded by Judah. So this arrangement of cities within another tribe’s land matches that picture of being spread out rather than settled as a large, distinct block.

Question 6

What does this section show about how Israel’s land was given out?

Accepted Answer

This section shows that the land was not handed out in a casual way. The text speaks of lots being cast, tribes being named, and cities and villages carefully listed. Simeon receives an inheritance “according to their families,” which points to an ordered division among households and clans. It also shows that not every tribe received land in the same way. Some, like Simeon, had their share inside another tribe’s borders. So the passage gives a picture of careful distribution, with attention to both God’s guidance in the lot and the size of each tribe.

Question 7

Why are so many city names listed, and not more stories or commands?

Accepted Answer

Here the focus is on recording the actual places that belonged to Simeon. The passage works like a boundary list or land record, naming towns and their villages so that later generations would know which tribe those places belonged to. There is no long story told around these names, but the list itself is important. It shows that Simeon really did receive a share in the land, and it fixes that share in specific locations in the south. For the people of Israel, these names marked home, inheritance, and God’s settled gift.

Question 8

How might this passage help someone reading the Bible today?

Accepted Answer

At first, a list of towns can feel distant, but it reminds us that God’s promises to give land to the tribes were carried out in real places with real borders. Simeon, though smaller, is not forgotten. The tribe is named, its lot is mentioned, and its cities are counted. This can encourage a reader to see that God’s care in the Bible includes details, not just big events. It also shows that different tribes were treated according to their size and situation, yet each received an inheritance as part of God’s people.

Joshua 19:1

And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.

Simeon’s Inheritance

metadata.crossReferences

Joshua 19:1

And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.

share.title

share.allVerses

share.verseWithContext

share.currentVerse

Simeon’s Inheritance

metadata.crossReferences