Question 1

What land did Reuben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh receive east of the Jordan?

Accepted Answer

These verses look back to the land already given to Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh before Israel crossed the Jordan. Their territory started from Aroer on the bank of the Arnon River, included the plains around Medeba and Dibon, and stretched through the cities that had belonged to Sihon, king of the Amorites, who ruled from Heshbon. It also reached through Gilead, up to Mount Hermon, and all Bashan as far as Salcah, the kingdom of Og who ruled in Ashtaroth and Edrei. In short, they received the former territories of Sihon and Og on the east side of the Jordan.

Question 2

Who were Sihon and Og, and why are they mentioned in this passage?

Accepted Answer

Sihon and Og were powerful kings who ruled lands east of the Jordan before Israel arrived. Sihon was king of the Amorites and ruled from Heshbon, and Og was king in Bashan, ruling from cities like Ashtaroth and Edrei. Og is noted as one of the last of the giants. This passage mentions them to remind readers that the land given to Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh was not empty. God had already given Israel victory through Moses over these strong rulers, so the land they now called their inheritance was the result of God’s earlier help and judgment on those nations.

Question 3

Why did Israel not drive out the Geshurites and the Maachathites from the land?

Accepted Answer

The passage simply states that the Israelites did not expel the Geshurites or the Maachathites, and that these peoples lived among Israel “until this day.” It does not give a detailed reason here, but this failure is set against the backdrop of God’s command to clear out the nations He had marked for judgment. Leaving them in place shows that Israel’s obedience was incomplete. Later in Scripture, these remaining groups become a snare and trouble for Israel. So this short note hints that not fully obeying God’s command would lead to ongoing problems among His people.

Question 4

Why did the tribe of Levi receive no land inheritance like the other tribes?

Accepted Answer

The tribe of Levi was set apart for special service to God in the worship life of Israel. Because of this, they did not receive a separate region of land as the other tribes did. Instead, their “inheritance” was the Lord Himself and what came from the offerings made to Him. The passage says the sacrifices made by fire to the Lord God of Israel were their inheritance. Along with tithes and firstfruits mentioned elsewhere, this provided for their needs. God chose to support them through the worship of the people, so they could focus on caring for the sanctuary and teaching His laws.

Question 5

What does it mean that the sacrifices of the Lord were the Levites’ inheritance?

Accepted Answer

When the passage says the sacrifices of the Lord made by fire are the Levites’ inheritance, it means that what was offered to God provided for the Levites’ daily needs. Parts of certain offerings belonged to them as God’s servants. They did not build wealth through owning large areas of land like the other tribes. Instead, they lived from what God’s people brought to Him. This taught both sides something important: the Levites were to depend on God as they served, and the rest of Israel was to support those who handled the holy things by bringing their offerings faithfully.

Question 6

What does this passage show about God’s promises and inheritance for His people?

Accepted Answer

This passage shows that God keeps His promises in detail. The land described is not random; it matches what God had said about giving Israel the territories of Sihon and Og. By calling the land an inheritance, the verses remind us that this was not just the result of war, but a gift passed down from God’s promise to the ancestors of Israel. It also shows that God decides how each tribe is provided for. Some receive large areas of land, while Levi receives the Lord and His offerings. In every case, God is the one who assigns and secures their portion.

Question 7

How should we understand the mention of giants in Bashan in this passage?

Accepted Answer

The passage notes that Og in Bashan was one of the remnant of the giants. This highlights how strong and fearful he and his people seemed. Mentioning this here underlines how great God’s help to Israel had been, since Moses and Israel were able to defeat such a king and take his land. It is not mainly about satisfying curiosity about giants, but about showing that God was stronger than the biggest enemies His people faced. The land given to the tribes east of the Jordan came from victories that would have looked impossible without God’s power.

Question 8

How does the failure to expel the Geshurites and Maachathites relate to Israel’s obedience?

Accepted Answer

By stating that Israel did not expel the Geshurites and the Maachathites, and that they still lived among them, the passage quietly points out a gap in obedience. God had told Israel to remove the nations He was judging, but they left some groups in place. Elsewhere in Scripture this kind of failure leads to those remaining peoples drawing Israel away from God. So here, even in a list of lands and victories, there is a warning: unfinished obedience leaves room for future trouble. It reminds readers that obeying God partway is not the same as following what He says fully.

Joshua 13:8

With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance, which Moses gave them, beyond Jordan eastward, even as Moses the servant of the Lord gave them;

The Inheritance East of the Jordan

Cross References

Joshua 13:8

With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance, which Moses gave them, beyond Jordan eastward, even as Moses the servant of the Lord gave them;

Share Options

All Verses

Verse + Context

Current Verse

The Inheritance East of the Jordan

Cross References