Question 1

Why was Jacob so upset when his sons told him about Egypt?

Accepted Answer

Jacob was already carrying deep pain over Joseph, whom he believed to be dead. When his sons told him that Simeon had been left in Egypt and that the ruler demanded Benjamin too, it felt like the same wound was being opened again. Then they all discovered that each man’s money was back in his sack. Instead of seeing this as kindness, Jacob feared it meant trouble and possible charges of theft. He thought he was losing child after child and cried out that everything was against him. His grief, fear, and distrust all came together in that moment.

Question 2

What does Jacob mean when he says, “All these things are against me”?

Accepted Answer

When Jacob says, “All these things are against me,” he is looking at his life only through what he can see and feel. He thinks Joseph is dead, Simeon is as good as lost in Egypt, and now his sons want to take Benjamin, the last son of Rachel. The returned money looks like a trap. From his view, every new event piles on more loss and risk. He does not yet see that God is using these very hardships to bring his family to safety and to restore relationships. His words show how easy it is to think God is against us when we cannot see His hidden care.

Question 3

Why were Jacob and his sons afraid when they found the money in their sacks?

Accepted Answer

They were afraid because the money being back in their sacks made the whole trip to Egypt look suspicious. They had gone to buy grain, paid for it, and now it looked as if they had taken both grain and money. They feared the Egyptian ruler would see this as theft or fraud if they returned. On top of that, Simeon was already being held there. The sight of the money, instead of bringing relief, stirred up their guilty consciences and stirred up Jacob’s fears. They assumed some hidden trouble was waiting for them, rather than seeing this as God’s quiet provision.

Question 4

Why did Jacob refuse to let Benjamin go down to Egypt with his brothers?

Accepted Answer

Jacob refused because Benjamin was the only remaining son of Rachel with him, and he believed Joseph, Benjamin’s full brother, was dead. In his mind, losing Benjamin would be unbearable. He says Benjamin is “left alone” and that if harm came to him, his gray hairs would go down to the grave in sorrow. He also seems to distrust his older sons because of how Joseph had disappeared in their care. So love, fear, past loss, and suspicion all combine. Even though sending Benjamin was the way to free Simeon and get more food, Jacob’s fear kept him from agreeing at this point.

Question 5

What was Reuben offering when he said, “Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee”?

Accepted Answer

Reuben was trying to convince his father to let Benjamin go by showing how serious he was about bringing him back safely. He offers his own two sons as a kind of pledge, saying Jacob could kill them if he failed. This is very extreme language. It shows both Reuben’s desperation and his lack of wisdom, since the death of two grandsons would not ease the loss of a beloved son. He is not really asking Jacob to do this, but speaking in a strong way to promise he will guard Benjamin. Even so, Jacob is not comforted by this offer and still refuses.

Question 6

What does this passage show about how fear can affect faith and judgment?

Accepted Answer

In this story, fear clouds almost every decision. The brothers fear being taken as spies and later fear the returned money means more trouble. Jacob fears losing Benjamin like he believes he lost Joseph. Because of this, he interprets events in the worst possible way and assumes that everything is against him. He does not yet see that God is arranging things for rescue and reunion. The passage shows how fear can make us misread what is happening and forget that God is still ruling over events. It reminds us that our first reading of painful events might be shaped more by fear than by trust.

Question 7

How does this story help someone today who feels everything is going wrong?

Accepted Answer

Someone who feels like Jacob, saying, “All these things are against me,” can see that God was at work even when Jacob felt abandoned. At this point, Jacob cannot see Joseph’s safety, Simeon’s future release, or the way God is using famine and trouble to move his family to a place of protection. Yet all of that is already in motion. In the same way, we often do not see what God is doing behind the scenes. This story gently shows that our understanding is limited, and that what looks like pure loss may, in time, prove to have been part of God’s care.

Question 8

What does this passage teach about God’s providence in family hardship?

Accepted Answer

The passage shows a family full of fear, guilt, and distrust, yet God is quietly guiding their story. The harsh ruler in Egypt is actually Joseph, whom God has raised up to preserve them in famine. The strange demand for Benjamin, the holding of Simeon, and even the money in the sacks are all pieces in a larger plan that will lead to confession, forgiveness, and safety. While the family only sees confusion and risk, God is steering events toward blessing. This teaches that God’s providence can be at work through ordinary and painful events, even when His purpose is not yet clear to us.

Genesis 42:29

¶ And they came unto Jacob their father unto the land of Canaan, and told him all that befell unto them; saying,

Joseph’s Brothers Return to Canaan

Simeon Is Held Hostage

metadata.crossReferences

Genesis 42:29

¶ And they came unto Jacob their father unto the land of Canaan, and told him all that befell unto them; saying,

share.title

share.allVerses

share.verseWithContext

share.currentVerse

Joseph’s Brothers Return to Canaan

Simeon Is Held Hostage

metadata.crossReferences