Question 1

Why were the men in this passage marrying strange wives a serious problem?

Accepted Answer

The problem was not about race or looks but about faith and worship. These “strange wives” were foreign women who did not belong to Israel’s covenant people and often brought their own gods and practices. God had warned Israel not to marry such women because they would turn their hearts away from him. When even priests and Levites did this, it showed how far the people had drifted. Their marriages threatened to mix idol worship into Israel’s life and to weaken their loyalty to the Lord.

Question 2

What does it mean that they gave their hands to put away their wives?

Accepted Answer

“They gave their hands” is a picture of making a firm promise. It likely means they pledged, in a visible and binding way, that they would actually send these foreign wives away. It was not just saying sorry with words. They agreed to a hard, practical step to turn from their disobedience. This gesture showed they accepted the decision, owned their guilt, and were willing to change their lives so that their homes would no longer pull them away from God’s commands.

Question 3

Why did some of the priests offer a ram of the flock for their trespass?

Accepted Answer

The priests who were guilty brought a ram as a trespass offering because they had broken God’s law. This offering admitted that they were wrong and that their sin deserved judgment. By bringing the ram, they sought forgiveness in the way God had set out in his law. It also set an example for others: if even leaders had to confess and bring an offering, then everyone who had done the same needed to take their sin seriously and seek mercy, not try to excuse or hide it.

Question 4

Why does this list include priests, Levites, singers, porters, and common people?

Accepted Answer

The list shows that this sin had spread through every level of the community. Priests and Levites, who were meant to teach and serve in worship, had failed. Singers and gatekeepers, who worked in the temple, were also involved. Many from the wider people of Israel had done the same. By naming them, the passage shows that sin is not limited to one group and that no one is above God’s commands. It also shows that repentance had to be just as wide as the disobedience had been.

Question 5

What does it mean that some of them had wives by whom they had children?

Accepted Answer

This note shows how painful and complicated their obedience was. Some of these marriages had gone on long enough that there were children. Sending the wives away would deeply affect families. The passage hints that not many such marriages had children, which some see as a sign of God’s displeasure. The text does not clearly say what happened to the children, but it does suggest that the men still chose to obey, even when it cost them dearly at a personal and family level.

Question 6

Why is this passage about putting away wives so hard to understand and accept today?

Accepted Answer

This passage feels very hard because it involves breaking up families, and the text gives few details. Readers today naturally worry about the women and children. The passage, however, is focused on Israel’s life as a restored people and their need to turn from anything that led them back toward idol worship. Faithful readers have seen this in more than one way, but all can agree that it shows sin has deep real-world costs and that returning to God can involve very painful choices.

Question 7

What does this passage teach about spiritual leadership and example?

Accepted Answer

The passage quietly warns that when leaders fail, many others follow. Some of the first names listed are from the family of the high priest. Those who knew the law best had broken it and, by their example, made it easier for others to do the same. Yet we also see that leaders can model repentance. They confessed, promised to change, and brought offerings. This reminds us that leaders are not perfect, but they are called both to obey God’s word and, when they fail, to be quick to repent.

Question 8

How might a believer today think about applying this passage without copying its actions?

Accepted Answer

A believer today should not copy the exact actions, because this event belonged to a specific moment in Israel’s history under the old covenant. But the heart of it still speaks. It shows that God cares deeply about whom his people join themselves to and how that affects faith. It calls believers to be honest about relationships or habits that pull them away from God, to confess sin plainly, and to be willing to make hard changes rather than keep living in a way that dishonors him.

Ezra 10:18

¶ And among the sons of the priests there were found that had taken strange wives: namely, of the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren; Maaseiah, and Eliezer, and Jarib, and Gedaliah.

Those Guilty of Intermarriage

metadata.crossReferences

Ezra 10:18

¶ And among the sons of the priests there were found that had taken strange wives: namely, of the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren; Maaseiah, and Eliezer, and Jarib, and Gedaliah.

share.title

share.allVerses

share.verseWithContext

share.currentVerse

Those Guilty of Intermarriage

metadata.crossReferences