Question 1

Who are the wise men and seven princes mentioned in this passage?

Accepted Answer

The wise men are advisers who “knew the times,” meaning they were experienced in law, judgment, and how the kingdom usually handled difficult cases. Closest to the king were seven high officials of Persia and Media: Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan. They had the right to see the king’s face and sat first in the kingdom. In this scene, they act as his inner council, and one of them, Memucan, speaks up with a plan for how to deal with Queen Vashti’s refusal.

Question 2

Why did King Ahasuerus ask what should be done to Queen Vashti according to law?

Accepted Answer

The king believed Vashti’s refusal was more than a personal insult. He saw it as disobedience to a direct royal command. Because of that, he wanted to know what should happen “according to law,” not just according to his anger. This is why he turned to those who knew law and judgment. Even though the king’s judgment was clouded by wine and pride, the story shows he was still trying to frame his response as a legal matter, not just an emotional reaction.

Question 3

What was Memucan afraid would happen if Vashti was not punished?

Accepted Answer

Memucan said that if Vashti’s deed became known, all women would hear how the queen refused the king and might start to despise their husbands. He pictured wives throughout the empire saying, “The king commanded, and she did not come,” and then copying her response. He warned this would bring “too much contempt and wrath,” meaning there would be tension and anger in many homes. His fear was that one act of defiance at the top would spread disrespect and conflict through the whole society.

Question 4

Why did Memucan suggest a law that cannot be altered against Vashti?

Accepted Answer

Memucan advised that a royal command should be written among the laws of the Persians and Medes so it could not be changed. He urged that Vashti should never come again before the king and that her royal position be given to someone “better than she.” Making it an unchangeable law protected the decision from being reversed later. It also showed the whole empire that the king’s authority would be upheld, and that even a queen could lose her place if she refused his command.

Question 5

What does it mean that every man should bear rule in his own house?

Accepted Answer

The letters sent out in all languages said that every man should bear rule in his own house. In that culture, this meant the husband was recognized as the head of the household, and his word was to be respected. The decree aimed to make sure wives honored their husbands, from the greatest to the least. It even seems to assume the home would follow the husband’s language and customs. This passage describes what that empire commanded; it does not mean every detail reflects God’s ideal, but it shows how human rulers tried to enforce order.

Question 6

How does this passage fit into God’s larger plan in the story?

Accepted Answer

On the surface, this passage is about a proud king, a refusing queen, and a harsh law about marriage and authority. Yet it also quietly sets the stage for what comes next. Removing Vashti opens the way for another woman to become queen, and that will be Esther. Through these flawed decisions, God is at work behind the scenes, arranging events so that, in time, his people will be protected. The passage reminds us that God’s providence can work even through imperfect human choices.

Question 7

What does this scene show about authority and anger in leadership?

Accepted Answer

Here we see a ruler who has great power but struggles to rule his own emotions. He acts while “merry with wine” and stirred up by advisers who exaggerate the danger of Vashti’s act. Instead of calm leadership, there is fear of losing control and a rush into an unchangeable law. The passage warns how anger and pride can shape public policy. It points to the need for leaders who are slow to anger, able to listen wisely, and careful about the long-term effects of their decisions.

Question 8

How can a modern reader apply this passage about Vashti and the decree?

Accepted Answer

Reading this today, we can notice several things. First, power used in anger leads to harsh and lasting damage, so we should be slow to make big decisions when upset. Second, the passage shows that one person’s example, good or bad, can influence many; our choices may affect more people than we think. Third, it reminds us that human laws can be unfair or unwise, while God remains just and in control. This can move us to seek wisdom, practice self-control, and trust God’s unseen work.

Esther 1:13

¶ Then the king said to the wise men, which knew the times, (for so was the king’s manner toward all that knew law and judgment:

Queen Vashti Deposed

metadata.crossReferences

Esther 1:13

¶ Then the king said to the wise men, which knew the times, (for so was the king’s manner toward all that knew law and judgment:

share.title

share.allVerses

share.verseWithContext

share.currentVerse

Queen Vashti Deposed

metadata.crossReferences