Question 1

Why did God not answer Saul when he asked about attacking the Philistines?

Accepted Answer

When Saul asked God if he should go down after the Philistines, there was no answer that day. This silence showed that something was wrong between God and the people. Earlier, Saul had acted in a rash and proud way, including making a harsh oath that no one should eat. Instead of first looking at his own actions, he assumed the guilt must be in the people. The silence was like a warning light, calling him to search out sin and to see how his own choices had grieved God.

Question 2

Why did Saul think someone had sinned and needed to be found by lot?

Accepted Answer

Saul knew that God’s silence was not without cause, so he was sure that some sin was blocking God’s answer. He called all the leaders together and said they must find where the sin was that day. Instead of checking his own heart and his rash oath about fasting, he put the blame on the camp and even swore that the guilty one must die, even if it was Jonathan. To uncover the person, he used the casting of lots, treating it as a way for God to point out the offender.

Question 3

What is the meaning of Saul’s request, “Give a perfect lot”?

Accepted Answer

When Saul asked God to “give a perfect lot,” he was asking for a clear and right answer through the casting of lots. He wanted God to show who was guilty and who was innocent. The lot first singled out Saul and Jonathan from the people, then Jonathan from Saul. This showed that God does rule over the outcome of lots. At the same time, Saul’s use of the lot sat alongside his own stubborn spirit and his failure to see that the real problem began with his own foolish oath.

Question 4

Why was Jonathan taken by lot if he did not knowingly do wrong?

Accepted Answer

Jonathan had eaten a little honey, not knowing about Saul’s command that no one should eat. In that sense he had not acted in open disobedience. Yet the lot pointed to him as the one connected with the matter that had brought trouble. This let the hidden event come to light so it could be dealt with. It also upheld the idea that sin, even when done without knowing, still matters before God. At the same time, God had another way to spare Jonathan’s life, through the bold stand of the people.

Question 5

Why did Saul insist that Jonathan must die for tasting honey?

Accepted Answer

Saul had sworn that whoever broke his command about fasting must die, and he backed it with an oath on God’s name. When Jonathan admitted he had tasted honey, Saul felt locked in by his own words and wanted to show himself firm and strict. Instead of seeking God again, or weighing Jonathan’s ignorance and his brave service that day, Saul clung to his vow. His harsh sentence shows how foolish and damaging rash words can be, especially from a leader who cares more about his own image than about wise mercy.

Question 6

How did the people rescue Jonathan from being killed by Saul?

Accepted Answer

When Saul said Jonathan must die, the people would not accept it. They spoke up together and reminded Saul that Jonathan had been the one God used to bring a great victory that day. They said clearly that not even a hair of his head should fall to the ground, because he had worked with God. By their strong words and firm stand, they stopped Saul from carrying out the sentence. In this way, the people honored the one God had used, and Jonathan’s life was spared without a fight, just by their united answer.

Question 7

What does this passage teach about rash vows and leadership?

Accepted Answer

This story shows how a rash vow from a leader can hurt innocent people and even threaten those who serve well. Saul’s oath that no one should eat weakened his army and put Jonathan in danger. When challenged, he chose to cling to his words instead of humbling himself. Good leadership requires patience, seeking God with a willing heart, and being ready to admit when a promise was foolish. It also shows that those under authority sometimes need to speak up when a command leads to clear injustice.

Question 8

What does this account show about God’s guidance and human responsibility?

Accepted Answer

Here we see that God’s guidance is not something we can force. Saul asked questions, but God stayed silent because of sin and rash actions. God used the lot to expose what was hidden, yet people in the story were still responsible for how they responded. Saul used God’s name to hold up a foolish vow, while the people used God’s name to protect Jonathan. So God is in control, but he also calls people to seek him honestly, own their faults, and act with courage and mercy when wrong decisions are made.

Question 9

How can this passage help someone today with their words and promises?

Accepted Answer

This passage warns us to be slow and careful with our words, especially when we make promises in God’s name. Saul spoke in haste and later felt trapped by his own oath, even though it harmed his own son and weakened God’s people. Today, this can remind us to pray before we speak, to avoid harsh or sweeping vows, and to be humble enough to admit when we have spoken foolishly. It also encourages us to value mercy, like the people who stepped in to protect Jonathan, rather than pressing a point just to save face.

1 Samuel 14:37

And Saul asked counsel of God, Shall I go down after the Philistines? wilt thou deliver them into the hand of Israel? But he answered him not that day.

The People Save Jonathan

metadata.crossReferences

1 Samuel 14:37

And Saul asked counsel of God, Shall I go down after the Philistines? wilt thou deliver them into the hand of Israel? But he answered him not that day.

share.title

share.allVerses

share.verseWithContext

share.currentVerse

The People Save Jonathan

metadata.crossReferences